Evaluation Checklists
Structured prompts for methodology, reporting, ethics, and interpretation review.
Reviewer Support Toolkit
Reviewer Resources
Reviewer Resources
Journal of Migraine Management
Tools and guidance for reviewers to deliver consistent, high-value manuscript evaluations.
45%APC Savings
Global -Research Community
24/7Editorial Support
Resource Hub
Reviewer Resources for Consistent Quality
The journal provides practical tools to support accurate, efficient, and policy-aligned reviewer decisions.
Policy References
Quick access to ethics, integrity, conflict, and correction policies.
Template Language
Recommended language for clear, actionable author feedback.
Escalation Guidance
Steps for reporting integrity concerns or complex decision conflicts.
Resource usage improves consistency across reviewer decisions and reduces avoidable back-and-forth during revision cycles.
Periodic updates are shared when policy changes or reporting standards evolve.
Continuous Development
Training and Support Opportunities
Ongoing development helps maintain high standards as methods and expectations evolve.
- Brief updates on reporting standards and integrity practices.
- Case-based discussions for handling complex submissions.
- Support contact for process clarification and technical questions.
- Guidance on balancing decision speed with methodological depth.
Experienced contributors may be invited to support peer mentoring and theme-specific quality initiatives.
Review templates improve consistency by ensuring core validity checks are addressed in every report. Structured workflows reduce accidental omissions.
Policy quick-guides help reviewers interpret ethical and disclosure issues without delaying recommendations. Fast policy access improves review confidence.
Resource-supported reviewing often yields clearer, more actionable comments that authors can implement effectively. Better feedback improves manuscript outcomes.
Escalation resources are particularly useful when integrity concerns arise and require evidence-based reporting. Proper escalation protects process fairness.
Periodic standards updates help reviewers stay aligned with current reporting expectations and methodological norms. Ongoing calibration improves decision quality.
Support channels enable reviewers to resolve procedural questions quickly and maintain timely turnaround commitments. Operational clarity benefits all participants.
Review templates improve consistency by ensuring core validity checks are addressed in every report. Structured workflows reduce accidental omissions.
Policy quick-guides help reviewers interpret ethical and disclosure issues without delaying recommendations. Fast policy access improves review confidence.
Resource-supported reviewing often yields clearer, more actionable comments that authors can implement effectively. Better feedback improves manuscript outcomes.
Escalation resources are particularly useful when integrity concerns arise and require evidence-based reporting. Proper escalation protects process fairness.
Periodic standards updates help reviewers stay aligned with current reporting expectations and methodological norms. Ongoing calibration improves decision quality.
Use Reviewer Resources
Apply structured resources to improve review quality and decision clarity.
Editorial support: [email protected]
