Profile Submission
Provide CV, affiliation details, and focused subject expertise categories.
Reviewer Application Route
Reviewer Register
Reviewer Register
Journal of Migraine Management
Register as a reviewer and help strengthen methodological quality across migraine manuscripts.
45%APC Savings
Global -Research Community
24/7Editorial Support
Eligibility
Reviewer Registration Requirements
The journal welcomes qualified reviewers with demonstrated expertise relevant to migraine and headache medicine.
- Recent publication or clinical evidence of domain expertise.
- Ability to evaluate methodology and interpret results objectively.
- Commitment to confidentiality and professional communication.
- No unmanaged conflict that could bias recommendations.
- Reliable availability for assigned timelines.
Early-career applicants with strong methodological training may also be considered with mentorship support where available.
Application Process
How to Submit Your Registration
Complete applications receive faster review and onboarding.
Evidence of Experience
List selected publications, prior review activity, or clinical leadership evidence.
Conflict Disclosure
Declare professional or financial relationships relevant to migraine therapeutics.
Editorial Confirmation
The office confirms role suitability and onboarding steps by email.
Approved reviewers receive orientation materials, policy references, and contact pathways for ongoing support.
Detailed expertise profiles improve match quality and reduce assignments outside reviewer comfort zones. Better matching supports both quality and reviewer satisfaction.
Applicants should list methodological strengths as well as topical expertise to aid assignment calibration. This helps editors route complex submissions effectively.
Conflict declarations at registration stage improve trust and simplify assignment governance over time. Transparency protects review integrity from the outset.
Reliable turnaround capacity should be stated realistically to support predictable workflow planning. Availability clarity is essential for operational stability.
Early-career applicants can strengthen applications by highlighting focused technical competence and recent relevant publications. Specific evidence supports reviewer suitability.
Complete professional metadata helps editorial teams evaluate profile fit consistently and efficiently. Application completeness accelerates onboarding decisions.
Detailed expertise profiles improve match quality and reduce assignments outside reviewer comfort zones. Better matching supports both quality and reviewer satisfaction.
Applicants should list methodological strengths as well as topical expertise to aid assignment calibration. This helps editors route complex submissions effectively.
Conflict declarations at registration stage improve trust and simplify assignment governance over time. Transparency protects review integrity from the outset.
Reliable turnaround capacity should be stated realistically to support predictable workflow planning. Availability clarity is essential for operational stability.
Early-career applicants can strengthen applications by highlighting focused technical competence and recent relevant publications. Specific evidence supports reviewer suitability.
Register as a Reviewer
Submit your expertise profile and begin contributing to rigorous peer review workflows.
Editorial support: [email protected]
