Why Authors Choose Ongoing Issues
Thematic visibility with flexible timing and continued relevance as evidence evolves.
Publish within continuously updated migraine collections that keep focused evidence visible and clinically actionable over time.
Ongoing special issues provide a flexible route for focused evidence accumulation in active migraine topics.
Unlike fixed-window collections, ongoing issues remain open while topic relevance remains high and submission quality is strong.
This model supports rapidly evolving areas such as digital therapeutics, biologic strategy optimization, and complex comorbidity management in migraine care.
Thematic visibility with flexible timing and continued relevance as evidence evolves.
Concentrated access to related studies in one continuously updated collection.
Improved curation of emerging evidence and clearer topic-level impact signals.
Easier tracking of focused publication portfolios for training and policy programs.
Manuscripts should present clear contribution to the ongoing theme and maintain strong reporting quality.
Submissions that are out of theme or under-reported may be rerouted to regular issue consideration or declined at triage.
Accepted articles benefit from thematic grouping and coordinated visibility initiatives.
As collections grow, they offer an organized evidence map for clinicians, trainees, and policy teams seeking topic-specific updates.
Authors can also propose new ongoing collection themes when they can demonstrate sustained submission potential and qualified editorial support.
Ongoing collections work best when authors frame findings in relation to evolving evidence and care implications. Contextual framing helps readers interpret study significance over time.
Clear thematic tagging and consistent terminology improve navigability across collection articles. Better internal coherence supports long-term educational and clinical value.
Editors monitor sustained quality thresholds to ensure collection growth does not dilute methodological standards. Submission discipline remains essential throughout collection lifespan.
Authors can strengthen acceptance likelihood by citing key studies already in the collection and identifying incremental contribution clearly. Continuity improves thematic cohesion.
As evidence accumulates, collection summaries and cross-article comparisons become easier when outcomes are reported consistently. Standardized reporting benefits readers and reviewers alike.
Collection-level visibility improves when manuscripts include practical implications for clinicians and care systems. Applied relevance supports broader use beyond academic readership.
Ongoing collections work best when authors frame findings in relation to evolving evidence and care implications. Contextual framing helps readers interpret study significance over time.
Clear thematic tagging and consistent terminology improve navigability across collection articles. Better internal coherence supports long-term educational and clinical value.
Editors monitor sustained quality thresholds to ensure collection growth does not dilute methodological standards. Submission discipline remains essential throughout collection lifespan.
Use your preferred submission route and clearly identify thematic alignment in your cover letter and metadata.
Editorial support: [email protected]