Evaluation Checklists
Structured prompts for methodology, reporting, ethics, and interpretation review.
Editorial Support Toolkit
Editor Resources
Editor Resources
Journal of Migraine Management
Access checklists, policy tools, and support pathways for consistent editorial decision quality.
45%APC Savings
Global -Research Community
24/7Editorial Support
Resource Hub
Editor Resources for Consistent Quality
The journal provides practical tools to support accurate, efficient, and policy-aligned editor decisions.
Policy References
Quick access to ethics, integrity, conflict, and correction policies.
Template Language
Recommended language for clear, actionable author feedback.
Escalation Guidance
Steps for reporting integrity concerns or complex decision conflicts.
Resource usage improves consistency across editor decisions and reduces avoidable back-and-forth during revision cycles.
Periodic updates are shared when policy changes or reporting standards evolve.
Continuous Development
Training and Support Opportunities
Ongoing development helps maintain high standards as methods and expectations evolve.
- Brief updates on reporting standards and integrity practices.
- Case-based discussions for handling complex submissions.
- Support contact for process clarification and technical questions.
- Guidance on balancing decision speed with methodological depth.
Experienced contributors may be invited to support peer mentoring and theme-specific quality initiatives.
Resource usage is most effective when checklists are applied early in decision drafting rather than at final recommendation stage. Early structure reduces inconsistency and omission.
Template language can improve clarity while preserving individualized scientific judgment in feedback. Standardized communication helps authors respond more effectively.
Policy references should be consulted when handling borderline ethics or integrity questions to maintain consistent governance outcomes. Documentation improves defensibility of decisions.
Escalation guides help editors raise complex concerns without delaying overall workflow progress. Structured escalation protects both quality and timeliness.
Periodic resource updates reflect evolving reporting standards and should be integrated into routine editorial practice. Continuous calibration improves decision reliability.
Editors can use support channels to resolve process ambiguity quickly and avoid unnecessary author-facing delays. Efficient coordination improves stakeholder experience.
Resource usage is most effective when checklists are applied early in decision drafting rather than at final recommendation stage. Early structure reduces inconsistency and omission.
Template language can improve clarity while preserving individualized scientific judgment in feedback. Standardized communication helps authors respond more effectively.
Policy references should be consulted when handling borderline ethics or integrity questions to maintain consistent governance outcomes. Documentation improves defensibility of decisions.
Escalation guides help editors raise complex concerns without delaying overall workflow progress. Structured escalation protects both quality and timeliness.
Use Editorial Resources Effectively
Apply available tools to improve consistency, speed, and transparency in manuscript decisions.
Editorial support: [email protected]
