Editorial Policies

Maintaining integrity, transparency, and quality in plant genetics publishing.

All research manuscripts undergo rigorous single-blind peer review. Qualified reviewers with relevant expertise evaluate scientific merit, methodology, data presentation, and significance. Editors make final decisions based on reviewer recommendations while maintaining editorial independence.

• Submit original work not published elsewhere or under consideration at other journals
• Ensure all listed authors contributed substantially and approve the manuscript
• Disclose funding sources, conflicts of interest, and competing interests
• Provide accurate data and maintain records supporting reproducibility
• Obtain necessary permissions for third-party content
• Respond promptly and thoroughly to reviewer and editor communications

• Evaluate manuscripts based solely on scientific merit without discrimination
• Maintain confidentiality of submitted work until publication
• Recuse from decisions involving personal conflicts of interest
• Ensure fair, timely peer review with appropriate expertise
• Investigate ethical concerns and take appropriate action

• Provide objective, constructive feedback in timely manner
• Maintain confidentiality of manuscript content
• Decline reviews outside area of expertise or involving conflicts
• Report suspected misconduct to editors

Authors who believe their submitted manuscript received an unfair evaluation may request reconsideration. Appeals should be submitted in writing to the editorial office within 30 days of the decision, providing specific arguments and evidence supporting the request. Appeals are evaluated by editorial staff not involved in the original decision.

JGRC maintains transparent communication throughout the publication process. Authors receive timely updates on manuscript status, clear explanations of editorial decisions, and specific guidance for revision. We prioritize responsiveness and professionalism in all author, editor, and reviewer interactions.