Editor Resources
Tools and guidance to support editorial excellence.
Editorial Resources for JECT
Editors receive structured resources to ensure consistent decisions.
Guidance focuses on toxicology rigor and transparent reporting.
Journal at a glance: ISSN 2641-7669 | DOI Prefix 10.14302/issn.2641-7669 | License CC BY 4.0 | Peer reviewed, open access journal.
- Decision letter templates
- Reporting guideline checklists
- Ethics and conflict guidance
- Reviewer invitation templates
- Editorial support via [email protected]
- Updates on policy changes
- Training resources for new editors
- Access to reviewer performance tracking
Use these resources to maintain consistency.
- Scope fit screening prompts
- Reviewer reminder templates
- Checklists for safety reporting
- Decision letter examples
- Guidance on handling conflicts
For questions about scope, data reporting, or compliance, contact the editorial team for guidance before submission.
Editors have access to support resources for efficient review.
- Guidance on handling ethics queries
- Templates for reviewer invitations
- Decision letter examples
- Scope screening checklists
- Tools for reviewer tracking
The journal provides templates, checklists, and guidance that help editors deliver consistent decisions. These resources are designed to streamline screening and support fair peer review.
Editors can request assistance with reviewer selection, conflict of interest management, and policy interpretation. Support is available through the editorial office.
Use available support to manage reviews efficiently.
- Access screening checklists
- Use reviewer invitation templates
- Consult ethics guidance when needed
- Request help with reviewer delays
- Use decision letter examples
- Document conflicts of interest
- Coordinate with production staff
- Review policy updates regularly
These resources help maintain consistent workflows.
- Use scope screening templates
- Apply reporting checklists
- Consult ethics guidance when needed
- Use reviewer tracking tools
- Document decisions consistently
- Coordinate with production staff
- Access updated policy references
- Use decision letter samples
Use these resources to streamline decisions.
- Apply screening checklists consistently
- Use reviewer invitation templates
- Consult ethics guidance as needed
- Maintain decision records
- Use revision request templates
- Coordinate with production staff
- Access updated policy documents
- Request support for complex cases
Use these support tools to stay consistent.
- Use screening prompts for scope fit
- Refer to decision letter templates
- Apply ethics checklists
- Track reviewer timelines
- Document conflicts of interest
- Coordinate with the editorial office
- Maintain decision records
- Review policy updates regularly
Short notes on available tools.
- Use reviewer tracking tools
- Apply scope screening prompts
- Consult ethics checklists
- Document decision rationale
- Coordinate with production staff
- Access updated policy references
- Use decision templates
- Request support when needed
Need Editorial Support?
Reach out for guidance on review or policy questions.
Use these resources to keep reviews consistent and aligned with journal standards.
- Follow the scope checklist
- Use decision templates for clarity
- Document ethics concerns
- Refer to the reporting guidance
Keep these quick references handy during editor tasks.
- Use scope-fit keywords
- Document decision rationale
- Confirm reviewer alignment