Journal of Osteoarthritis and Cartilage

Journal of Osteoarthritis and Cartilage

Journal of Osteoarthritis and Cartilage – Reviewer Resources

Open Access & Peer-Reviewed

Submit Manuscript
Reviewer Resource Center

Reviewer Resources
Journal of Osteoarthritis and Cartilage

Use structured reviewer tools to deliver clear, consistent, and decision-ready evaluations for JOC submissions.

%
45%APC Savings
#
ClinicalResearch Community
OA
24/7Open Access
Reviewer Toolkit

Resources Available to JOC Reviewers

JOC provides practical tools to support consistent and high-value review reports.

Resource-supported review improves clarity, reduces omissions, and strengthens editorial decision readiness.

These materials help reviewers handle complex manuscripts with better structure and confidence.

Resource Components

Tools That Improve Review Quality

Structured resources reduce variability and improve recommendation utility.

Review Templates

Structured sections for methods, interpretation, ethics, and disclosure checks.

Policy Summaries

Quick guidance on conflict, confidentiality, and integrity escalation.

Checklist Aids

Stepwise prompts to reduce omission risk in complex evaluations.

Escalation Guidance

Defined channels for reporting serious ethics or data concerns.

Communication Guidance

Recommendations for clear, constructive, and neutral review language.

Standards Updates

Periodic updates on evolving reporting and policy expectations.

Performance Benefit

How Resources Improve Efficiency

Consistent resource use supports both quality and turnaround reliability.

  • Reduces time spent formatting reports from scratch.
  • Improves consistency of evidence-based critique across assignments.
  • Makes major and minor issues easier for authors and editors to interpret.
  • Supports fair handling of policy-related reviewer concerns.
  • Strengthens decision readiness for editorial teams.

Structured templates reduce omission risk and improve recommendation clarity.

Policy references support fair handling of ethics and conflict concerns.

Checklist-driven review improves consistency across different manuscript types.

Support channels help reviewers resolve procedural questions quickly.

Updated standards guidance keeps evaluation aligned with current expectations.

Structured templates reduce omission risk and improve recommendation clarity.

Policy references support fair handling of ethics and conflict concerns.

Checklist-driven review improves consistency across different manuscript types.

Support channels help reviewers resolve procedural questions quickly.

Updated standards guidance keeps evaluation aligned with current expectations.

Structured templates reduce omission risk and improve recommendation clarity.

Policy references support fair handling of ethics and conflict concerns.

Checklist-driven review improves consistency across different manuscript types.

Support channels help reviewers resolve procedural questions quickly.

Updated standards guidance keeps evaluation aligned with current expectations.

Structured templates reduce omission risk and improve recommendation clarity.

Policy references support fair handling of ethics and conflict concerns.

Checklist-driven review improves consistency across different manuscript types.

Support channels help reviewers resolve procedural questions quickly.

Use JOC Reviewer Resources

Apply templates and policy guides to improve review quality and turnaround discipline.

Editorial office: [email protected]