Journal of Osteoarthritis and Cartilage

Journal of Osteoarthritis and Cartilage

Journal of Osteoarthritis and Cartilage – Reviewer Register

Open Access & Peer-Reviewed

Submit Manuscript
Reviewer Registration

Reviewer Register
Journal of Osteoarthritis and Cartilage

Join the JOC reviewer network to support rigorous, fair, and timely evaluation of osteoarthritis research.

%
45%APC Savings
#
ClinicalResearch Community
OA
24/7Open Access
Reviewer Registration

Register as a JOC Reviewer

JOC invites qualified reviewers across orthopedics, rheumatology, rehabilitation, and translational musculoskeletal research.

Detailed reviewer profiles help editors assign manuscripts efficiently and maintain high review relevance.

Complete registration data supports fair workload planning and quality-focused reviewer matching.

Profile Requirements

Information to Include

Comprehensive profiles improve onboarding speed and assignment precision.

  • Primary and secondary expertise areas relevant to submitted manuscript types.
  • Methodological strengths including trials, observational analysis, and synthesis methods.
  • Current institutional affiliation and publication background summary.
  • ORCID or professional identifier for profile validation.
  • Conflict disclosure and realistic review availability declaration.

Early-career reviewers are welcome when technical competence and publication familiarity are clearly shown.

Editorial onboarding includes quality expectations, confidentiality, and communication guidance.

Assignment Model

How JOC Selects Reviewers

Assignments are based on expertise fit, neutrality, and turnaround reliability.

Expertise Fit

Editors prioritize topic and methods alignment for each manuscript.

Conflict Screening

Potential conflicts are assessed before assignment confirmation.

Turnaround Reliability

Consistent completion history supports priority assignment selection.

Review Quality

Constructive, evidence-based prior reviews strengthen reviewer trust.

Detailed reviewer profiles enable better expertise matching for submissions.

Availability transparency supports realistic planning and turnaround reliability.

Conflict declarations should be complete at registration and assignment acceptance.

Methodological competencies improve fit for technically complex manuscripts.

Professional identifiers strengthen profile trust and evaluation consistency.

Detailed reviewer profiles enable better expertise matching for submissions.

Availability transparency supports realistic planning and turnaround reliability.

Conflict declarations should be complete at registration and assignment acceptance.

Methodological competencies improve fit for technically complex manuscripts.

Professional identifiers strengthen profile trust and evaluation consistency.

Detailed reviewer profiles enable better expertise matching for submissions.

Availability transparency supports realistic planning and turnaround reliability.

Conflict declarations should be complete at registration and assignment acceptance.

Methodological competencies improve fit for technically complex manuscripts.

Professional identifiers strengthen profile trust and evaluation consistency.

Detailed reviewer profiles enable better expertise matching for submissions.

Availability transparency supports realistic planning and turnaround reliability.

Conflict declarations should be complete at registration and assignment acceptance.

Methodological competencies improve fit for technically complex manuscripts.

Professional identifiers strengthen profile trust and evaluation consistency.

Register for JOC Peer Review

Submit your expertise profile and availability for reviewer onboarding.

Editorial office: [email protected]