IPJ provides reviewers with resources to support consistent, high quality feedback on physiology research. Resources include checklists, guidance on study validation, and reporting standards.

• Trial validation checklist
• Data transparency guidance
• Reviewer report template
• Ethics and conflict of interest guidelines

Reviewers should focus on methodological rigor, clarity of assumptions, and the reproducibility of results. Provide actionable recommendations that help authors improve transparency.

For additional resources or questions about review expectations, contact [email protected].

Access structured resources to support consistent, high quality reviews.

• Review templates and scoring guidance
• Checklist for physiology measurement reporting
• Ethics and conflict of interest reminders
• Guidance on reproducibility and data sharing

Editors and reviewers help maintain the integrity of physiology research. IPJ expects timely, constructive feedback that improves clarity and reproducibility.

• Focus on methodological rigor and physiological relevance.
• Provide actionable comments for authors.
• Declare conflicts of interest before accepting assignments.
• Maintain confidentiality of submitted work.

Timely, fair, and constructive input helps IPJ maintain publication quality.

• Respond to invitations promptly.
• Submit reviews within agreed timelines.
• Provide balanced feedback with actionable guidance.
• Respect confidentiality of submitted work.

IPJ is committed to rigorous, transparent publishing in physiology research. We emphasize reproducible methods, clear reporting of experimental protocols, and ethical compliance across all article types.

The editorial office supports authors, editors, and reviewers with clear guidance and responsive communication. For questions about scope or workflow, contact [email protected].

We encourage continuous improvement in reporting practices and share updates that help the community maintain high standards in human and comparative physiology.