Journal of Plant and Animal Ecology

Journal of Plant and Animal Ecology

Journal of Plant and Animal Ecology – Reviewer Guidelines

Open Access & Peer-Reviewed

Submit Manuscript

Reviewer Guidelines

Guidance for reviewers assessing ecology manuscripts.

Rigorous ReviewEvaluate methods and validation.
Data TransparencyCheck data and code reporting.
Ethical StandardsMaintain confidentiality.
Constructive FeedbackImprove manuscript quality.

Journal at a Glance

ISSN: 2637-6075
DOI Prefix: 10.14302/issn.2637-6075
License: CC BY 4.0
Peer reviewed open access journal

Scope Alignment

Plant ecology, animal ecology, community dynamics, biodiversity, conservation biology, ecosystem function, and human environmental interactions. We prioritize field validated studies.

Publishing Model

Open access, single blind peer review, and rapid publication after acceptance and production checks. Metadata validation and DOI registration are included.

Reviewer Expectations

JPAE reviewers evaluate methodological rigor, data transparency, and ecological relevance in submissions. Reviews should be constructive, evidence based, and focused on improving the manuscript.

Core Review Criteria
  • Clear research question and scope alignment
  • Transparent field methods and sampling design
  • Appropriate analytical methods and validation
  • Interpretation aligned with ecological outcomes
  • Reproducibility and data sharing considerations
Structured Review Steps
1

Assess Scope

Confirm alignment with ecology focus.

2

Evaluate Methods

Check field protocols and validation.

3

Review Results

Assess clarity, significance, and limitations.

4

Provide Feedback

Offer actionable, respectful guidance.

Reviewer FAQ

How long should a review take?

Most reviews are expected within 2 to 3 weeks.

Can I decline a review?

Yes. Inform the editor promptly so alternatives can be found.

What if data are missing?

Recommend revisions or request clarifications.

JPAE Commitment

JPAE is committed to rigorous, transparent publishing in plant and animal ecology. We emphasize reproducible field methods, clear reporting of ecological context, and ethical compliance across all article types.

The editorial office supports authors, editors, and reviewers with clear guidance and responsive communication. For questions about scope or workflow, contact [email protected].

We encourage continuous improvement in reporting practices and share updates that help the community maintain high standards in ecological research and conservation science.

Become a Reviewer

Support rigorous ecology research through peer review.