Journal of Patient Care and Services

Journal of Patient Care and Services

Journal of Patient Care and Services – Call For Papers

Open Access & Peer-Reviewed

Submit Manuscript
Call For Papers

Call for High Impact Studies in Patient Care and Services

The Journal of Patient Care and Services invites original, practice focused, and policy relevant manuscripts that strengthen care quality, patient experience, and health service performance. We welcome multidisciplinary contributions from clinicians, nurse researchers, care administrators, digital health teams, quality officers, public health specialists, and implementation scientists. If your work improves real world service delivery, strengthens safety outcomes, or clarifies healthcare decision pathways, this is the right forum to present and scale your evidence.

45%APC Savings
Global -Research Community
24/7Open Access

Priority Topics for Submission

Submissions are evaluated for methodological rigor, practical relevance, ethical clarity, and measurable contribution to patient care transformation.

Care Model Innovation

Integrated care, continuity strategies, transition of care models, and service redesign studies demonstrating measurable benefits for patients and providers.

Patient Safety and Quality Systems

Safety incident reduction, quality indicators, medication pathway reliability, and systems interventions that improve service reliability in clinical settings.

Nursing and Interprofessional Practice

Team based practice improvements, nursing leadership outcomes, cross discipline communication frameworks, and bedside process enhancement research.

Digital Service Delivery

Telehealth workflow performance, digital triage systems, remote monitoring, and patient engagement technologies with validated clinical or service outcomes.

Patient Experience and Access Equity

Experience metrics, communication quality, access barriers, community care approaches, and interventions that improve fairness in care delivery systems.

Healthcare Policy and Service Economics

Policy implementation outcomes, reimbursement effects, workforce strategy, and value based service optimization studies grounded in real world data.

Why Publish in JPCS

JPCS combines editorial rigor with market level visibility planning. Every accepted article is supported by strong metadata delivery, stable open access hosting, and structured dissemination pathways that improve discovery by clinicians, educators, managers, and researchers. Our editorial process emphasizes clear reviewer guidance and practical revision support so that your final publication reflects both scientific quality and applied value.

Authors also benefit from predictable communication cycles, transparent APC policy, and a submission experience designed for busy clinical teams. If your project has institutional stakeholders, our team can provide language that supports grant reporting and quality improvement documentation needs.

Submission Quality Checklist

  • Define patient population, care setting, and service objective clearly.
  • Provide methods that can be replicated across comparable care contexts.
  • Report measurable outcomes with transparent statistical interpretation.
  • State ethical approval, consent standards, and data handling approach.
  • Discuss implementation relevance, limits, and transferability conditions.
Strong submissions connect analysis to practical care decisions. Manuscripts that translate findings into operational guidance receive stronger reviewer traction.

How the Editorial Route Works

Our workflow is structured to keep momentum high while protecting academic and clinical quality standards.

1

Initial Screening

Editorial checks confirm fit, reporting completeness, and ethical readiness before full peer review assignment.

2

Expert Review

Reviewers assess design quality, validity of conclusions, and practical relevance for patient care and service settings.

3

Revision Round

Authors receive structured comments that prioritize clarity, methodological strength, and implementation relevance.

4

Publication

Accepted papers move to production with copyediting, metadata preparation, and immediate open access dissemination.

Common Author Questions

These questions are the most frequent during active calls for papers in care quality and service research tracks.

Do you accept implementation studies from single institutions?

Yes. Single site studies are welcome when methodology is clear, outcome logic is transparent, and limitations are discussed responsibly for transferability.

Can we submit multidisciplinary manuscripts with policy and clinical coauthors?

Yes. Interdisciplinary submissions are strongly encouraged because patient care outcomes often depend on cross functional decisions and service coordination.

Are negative or neutral findings considered?

Yes. Well designed studies with neutral findings are valuable for decision making and can prevent inefficient or unsafe implementation choices.

Can early career researchers receive guidance?

Yes. Our editorial communications are structured to help improve manuscript quality while preserving author ownership and scientific independence.

What Increases Acceptance Probability

Editors and reviewers consistently prioritize manuscripts that are methodologically transparent and operationally useful for real care environments.

Outcome Clarity

Define primary and secondary outcomes in advance and tie them to care quality, safety, cost, or service access decisions.

Implementation Relevance

Explain how findings can be adopted by healthcare teams, what resources are needed, and what barriers are likely.

Context Transparency

Report setting, staffing constraints, baseline process maturity, and patient profile details to support interpretation.

Responsible Limitations

Discuss uncertainty and transferability boundaries clearly so conclusions remain credible and decision ready.

Practical relevance does not reduce the need for rigorous methods. The strongest call for papers submissions combine both.

Pre Submission Positioning Note

Before upload, confirm your manuscript states one explicit care problem, one measurable objective, and one practical implication. This three point framing improves reviewer alignment and reduces requests for structural rewriting after first decision. Include this positioning in your abstract and cover letter.

Call readiness: manuscripts with explicit implementation context, outcome traceability, and transferable lessons typically move faster through review in this journal domain.

Submit to the Current Call For Papers

Choose your preferred submission method and send your manuscript to a journal focused on measurable patient care impact, implementation relevance, and global service visibility.