Author Guidance for JNPP Submissions
These instructions explain how to prepare and submit manuscripts to the Journal of Nervous System and Physiological Phenomena. Follow the guidance below to speed editorial checks, improve reviewer clarity, and maximize the impact of your neuroscience research.
Accepted Manuscript Categories
We welcome diverse article types that advance understanding of nervous system function, neurological disorders, and physiological mechanisms. Choose the category that best matches your study design.
Original Research and Clinical Studies
Full length research articles should present complete datasets, robust analysis, and clear clinical or mechanistic implications. Clinical studies must include ethics approval, trial registration when required, and transparent reporting of patient selection, outcomes, and limitations.
Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses
Evidence syntheses must follow recognized reporting frameworks such as PRISMA. Provide search strategies, inclusion criteria, risk of bias methods, and quantitative synthesis details to ensure reproducibility and clinical reliability.
Brief Reports and Methodology Papers
Short reports should deliver focused, high value findings with precise interpretation. Methodology papers must describe validation, limitations, and use cases for neural measurement tools, imaging workflows, or analytical techniques.
Manuscript Structure and Formatting
Consistent structure improves review speed and indexing quality. Ensure your submission includes the elements below and follows a clear scientific narrative.
Required Front Matter
Provide title, author names, affiliations, corresponding author details, and a structured abstract. Include 4 to 6 keywords that reflect core neuroscience concepts and physiological outcomes.
- Title reflects the central neural mechanism or clinical condition.
- Abstract summarizes objectives, methods, results, and conclusions.
- Keywords align with commonly searched neuroscience and clinical terms.
Main Text Sections
Organize the manuscript into Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion. For clinical studies, include patient selection, primary and secondary outcomes, and statistical justification. Use clear subsection headings to improve navigation.
- Methods describe protocols, instrumentation, and data processing.
- Results include objective findings with appropriate figures and tables.
- Discussion links results to prior work and states limitations.
Figures, Tables, and References
Submit high resolution figures with clear legends and unit labels. Tables should be editable, not embedded images. Use a consistent citation style and verify all references for accuracy.
- Figure captions explain experimental context and key outcomes.
- Tables present data clearly without duplicating the text.
- References include DOI or persistent identifiers when available.
Statistical Rigor and Reporting Transparency
Clear statistical reporting improves credibility and makes results easier to interpret across neuroscience and clinical audiences.
Study Design and Power
Describe the study design, sampling approach, and any randomization or blinding procedures. Provide sample size justification or power calculations when appropriate. For observational studies, explain selection criteria and potential sources of bias.
Statistical Reporting Requirements
Report exact p values, effect sizes, and confidence intervals when relevant. Explain any adjustments for multiple comparisons and clarify the primary endpoints. Use clear tables or figures to present key statistical outcomes.
Data Visualization Standards
Figures should include labeled axes, units, and appropriate scales. Avoid visual manipulation that could mislead interpretation. Provide raw data summaries where possible to support transparency and independent verification.
Cover Letter and Author Declarations
Clear declarations help editors evaluate fit, expertise, and integrity before peer review begins.
Cover Letter Essentials
Summarize the research question, key findings, and relevance to nervous system and physiological science. Identify any prior dissemination such as conference abstracts or preprints. You may suggest qualified reviewers and note any conflicts.
Authorship and Competing Interests
Provide author contributions and disclose funding sources, affiliations, and conflicts of interest. A transparent statement strengthens trust and ensures compliance with research integrity expectations.
Submission and Peer Review Workflow
Follow these steps to ensure a smooth editorial process. Complete submissions move faster and reduce revision cycles. If you are unsure about fit, send a presubmission inquiry with a short abstract and methods summary.
Prepare Files for Upload
Include the manuscript file, figures, tables, and supplemental materials. Ensure all data and code references are included and that files are labeled clearly for review.
Choose a Submission Method
Submit through Manuscript Zone for full tracking and reviewer communication, or use the Simple Manuscript Submission form for fast upload. Both methods reach the same editorial team.
Editorial Checks and Peer Review
Our editors verify fit, ethics, and completeness before assigning reviewers. Peer review focuses on methodological rigor, transparency, and contribution to neuroscience knowledge.
Revision and Final Decision
Address reviewer comments with a clear response letter. Revised manuscripts should highlight changes and describe how concerns were resolved. Final acceptance leads to production and immediate open access publication.
Ethics, Data, and Reporting Standards
Ethical compliance and transparent reporting are required for all submissions. Provide documentation that supports responsible neuroscience research.
Ethics Approval and Consent
Human and animal studies must include ethics committee approval and consent statements. Provide protocol numbers where applicable and describe protections for vulnerable populations. For multi center studies, list all approving bodies and data governance rules.
Data Availability and Reproducibility
Include a data availability statement that describes where datasets and code can be accessed. If data are restricted, explain the reason and the access pathway. Reproducible workflows strengthen reviewer confidence and future reuse.
Reporting Guidelines
Use appropriate reporting guidelines such as CONSORT, PRISMA, ARRIVE, or STROBE depending on study type. Explicit adherence improves clarity and reduces post review revisions.
Open Access and Publication Policies
Our publishing model ensures immediate access to accepted work while protecting author rights and preserving the integrity of the scholarly record.
Open Access Availability
All accepted articles are published with open access and are immediately available to readers worldwide. This supports clinical translation, educational use, and interdisciplinary discovery without subscription barriers.
APC and Billing Guidance
APCs are invoiced after acceptance. Institutions may request direct billing or documentation for grant reporting. Contact the editorial office if you need a pro forma invoice or payment confirmation for compliance.
Author Rights and Licensing
Authors retain scholarly credit and may share their work widely after publication. Licensing is designed to support reuse with proper attribution while protecting the integrity of the published version. If you have funder specific license requirements, notify the editorial office at acceptance.
Common Author Questions
These answers address frequent issues that delay review or production. Use them to finalize your submission checklist.
What file formats are accepted?
Do you allow preprints?
Is language editing required?
How should conflicts of interest be reported?
What happens after acceptance?
Can I submit supplemental data?
How long after acceptance will my article publish?
Do you provide templates or checklists?
Submit Your Manuscript with Confidence
Follow these instructions to improve review quality, accelerate editorial decisions, and increase the impact of your neuroscience research. Use the submission route that matches your workflow. Our team is available to answer pre submission questions about scope or compliance. Checklists are available on request and we respond within one business day for urgent queries.