Clinical Relevance
Does the theme address decisions, outcomes, or unresolved practice gaps in urology?
Develop a focused urology collection with clear scientific goals, strong editorial leadership, and measurable publication value.
JMSU invites focused special issue concepts that address pressing urology questions with measurable editorial impact.
A strong proposal defines clear thematic scope, intended contribution types, and clinical relevance for the target readership.
Guest editor teams should demonstrate topic expertise, editorial discipline, and transparent conflict management readiness.
Proposals are reviewed for feasibility, novelty, contributor pipeline strength, and long-term value to practitioners and researchers.
Complete proposals accelerate decision-making and improve planning quality for approved collections.
Approval decisions balance scientific merit with operational feasibility and collection quality controls.
Does the theme address decisions, outcomes, or unresolved practice gaps in urology?
Are proposed subtopics aligned enough to create a meaningful, integrated collection?
Can the team maintain review quality, fairness, and timeline reliability?
Is there realistic potential for high-quality submissions within the proposed window?
Are conflict, integrity, and disclosure controls defined clearly from the outset?
Will the issue likely improve readership value, citation utility, and field-level discussion?
Strong proposals define measurable objectives, scope limits, and contributor strategy from the beginning.
Guest editor teams should present complementary expertise and conflict management plans.
Proposals with practical clinical relevance and coherent subtopics are prioritized for approval review.
Timeline discipline and outreach readiness are key factors in editorial feasibility assessment.
Theme governance quality directly influences the scientific consistency of the final collection.
Strong proposals define measurable objectives, scope limits, and contributor strategy from the beginning.
Guest editor teams should present complementary expertise and conflict management plans.
Proposals with practical clinical relevance and coherent subtopics are prioritized for approval review.
Timeline discipline and outreach readiness are key factors in editorial feasibility assessment.
Theme governance quality directly influences the scientific consistency of the final collection.
Strong proposals define measurable objectives, scope limits, and contributor strategy from the beginning.
Guest editor teams should present complementary expertise and conflict management plans.
Proposals with practical clinical relevance and coherent subtopics are prioritized for approval review.
Timeline discipline and outreach readiness are key factors in editorial feasibility assessment.
Submit your concept through the journals workflow and the editorial team will evaluate fit, feasibility, and strategic impact.
Editorial office: [email protected]