Reviewer Resources

Tools and guidance for high quality peer review.

• Structured review templates and scoring rubrics
• Guidance on evaluating colorectal oncology outcomes
• Ethics and integrity escalation pathways
• Data transparency and reproducibility checklists
• Communication tips for constructive reviews

• Editorial office support via [email protected]
• Updates on reporting standards for oncology studies
• Resources on clinical trial reporting
• Guidance for handling revisions and rebuttals

Resources include structured review templates, reporting checklists, and guidance on assessing clinical impact. These tools help reviewers deliver consistent and thorough evaluations.

• Checklists for clinical trial reporting
• Guidance on statistical review
• Ethics and conflict of interest policies

The editorial office provides support for review timelines and questions. Contact [email protected] for assistance.

Using shared resources improves fairness and transparency in peer review, helping authors understand expectations.

Templates guide reviewers to evaluate study design, statistical rigor, and clinical relevance in a consistent format.

Reporting guides help reviewers verify that manuscripts include staging, treatment details, and outcome measures required for clinical interpretation.

Reviewers can use reporting aids to verify study design, outcome reporting, and statistical transparency. These resources support consistent assessments across colorectal cancer submissions.

• CONSORT, STROBE, and PRISMA checklists
• Outcome reporting guidance for clinical trials
• Templates for structured review summaries

Resources help reviewers deliver consistent, clinically focused evaluations.

• Structured templates for review reports
• Guidance on trial and outcomes reporting
• Checklists for imaging and pathology details
• Policies for confidentiality and ethics

Reviewers can access concise resources to speed assessments.

• Key outcome reporting checklists
• Guidance for statistical appraisal
• Templates for structured comments
• Summaries of ethics requirements

Use available guidance to streamline reviews.

• Checklists for outcomes reporting
• Guidance on clinical endpoints
• Reference templates for review comments
• Suggestions for statistical checks

Use tools to streamline review preparation.

• Reference reporting checklists for faster review
• Use templates to structure major comments
• Apply ethics guidance for consistency

Use guidance to maintain consistent reviews.

• Follow reporting checklists
• Apply ethics guidance when needed

Consistent reviews support fair decisions.

• Use uniform structure across reviews
• Reference outcomes and endpoints clearly
• Note ethical or reporting gaps

Consistent review structure helps editors compare feedback and provide authors with clear, actionable guidance.

Use provided templates to keep reviews focused and comparable.

Use provided guidance to keep reviews concise and balanced.