Reviewer Guidelines
Guidance for reviewers assessing infection prevention manuscripts.
Journal at a Glance
ISSN: 2690-4837
DOI Prefix: 10.14302/issn.2690-4837
License: CC BY 4.0
Peer reviewed open access journal
Scope Alignment
Infection prevention, healthcare epidemiology, antimicrobial stewardship, outbreak response, surveillance systems, vaccine policy, WASH, environmental hygiene, and One Health implementation science. We prioritize actionable evidence and measurable impact.
Publishing Model
Open access, single blind peer review, and rapid publication after acceptance and production checks. Metadata validation and DOI registration are included.
IJIP reviewers evaluate methodological rigor, data transparency, and prevention relevance in submissions. Reviews should be constructive, evidence based, and focused on improving the manuscript.
- Clear research question and scope alignment
- Transparent surveillance methods and case definitions
- Appropriate analytical methods and validation
- Interpretation aligned with prevention outcomes
- Reproducibility and data sharing considerations
Assess Scope
Confirm alignment with infection prevention focus.
Evaluate Methods
Check surveillance protocols and validation.
Review Results
Assess clarity, significance, and limitations.
Provide Feedback
Offer actionable, respectful guidance.
- Maintain confidentiality of manuscripts
- Declare conflicts of interest
- Report ethical or data integrity concerns
- Avoid using unpublished data for personal gain
How long should a review take?
Most reviews are expected within 2 to 3 weeks.
Can I decline a review?
Yes. Inform the editor promptly so alternatives can be found.
What if data are missing?
Recommend revisions or request clarifications.
IJIP is committed to rigorous, transparent publishing in infection prevention and control. We emphasize reproducible surveillance methods, clear reporting of case definitions, and ethical compliance across all article types.
The editorial office supports authors, editors, and reviewers with clear guidance and responsive communication. For questions about scope or workflow, contact [email protected].
We encourage continuous improvement in reporting practices and share updates that help the community maintain high standards in infection prevention science and implementation.
Become a Reviewer
Support rigorous infection prevention research through peer review.
