Editorial assessment
Consider the manuscript’s relevance to HIV/AIDS research, scientific quality, reporting and ethical conduct.
A single, practical guide to editorial responsibilities, research-integrity expectations and the support available for handling HIV/AIDS manuscripts.
Editors help maintain a fair, rigorous scholarly record by matching appropriate HIV/AIDS submissions with suitable reviewers, considering the evidence and communicating decisions clearly. Editorial service should be guided by the work’s relevance, scientific quality and ethical conduct.
These responsibilities consolidate the verified guidance currently spread across the editor-guidelines, editor-resources and editor-registration pages.
Consider the manuscript’s relevance to HIV/AIDS research, scientific quality, reporting and ethical conduct.
Identify reviewers with appropriate subject expertise and manage conflicts of interest before an invitation is accepted.
Use reviewer input and the manuscript record to support clear, consistent editorial decisions and revision requests.
Escalate concerns about plagiarism, data integrity, authorship or other ethical issues to the editorial office for guidance.
Editorial judgment carries a duty to handle sensitive HIV research with care, fairness and a transparent record of reasoning.
Treat submitted manuscripts and reviewer comments as confidential and use them only for editorial evaluation.
Disclose relevant conflicts promptly and decline an assignment when an impartial assessment is not possible.
Keep correspondence professional, evidence-led and focused on the work rather than the author.
Document decision rationale and follow the journal’s policy framework consistently.
Support should help editors apply consistent standards without making claims about fixed review times or system capabilities that have not been independently verified.
The current editor-resources material describes manuscript tracking, reviewer invitations, decision recording and author communication through ManuscriptZone.
Editorial support includes decision templates, reviewer reminders and escalation pathways for complex ethics or conflict questions.
JCRHAP recognises editorial service and can provide certificates or service documentation for academic records on request.
Use the editorial-office contact for questions about the journal’s current editorial needs, relevant HIV/AIDS expertise and the next appropriate step.
See the journal’s editorial board.
Peer review, ethics, authorship and the published record.
The HIV/AIDS research remit that guides editorial assessment.
Consolidated reviewer guidance.
For information about editorial service, contact the JCRHAP editorial office.